DSM Paper Guidelines and Rubric<\/p>\n
Students will write a 6-8 page research paper that will critically evaluate the treatment(s) available for a specific disorder, within a specified population.<\/p>\n
Include: (a) DSM-5 disorder with relevant diagnostic criteria, (b) prevalence of the disorder in the general population and a discussion of how that disorder is relevant to a particular population of your choosing (this could be individuals of a certain age group, gender, sexual orientation, racial\/ethnic background, etc.), and (c) detail of what treatment may look like for individuals with this disorder in the population selected. The paper should be between 6-8 pages, double spaced (not including title page or reference page). The DSM-5 and a minimum of two additional sources used (ideally peer-reviewed journal articles, though textbooks are also acceptable) should be cited. Use the current APA 7th formatting throughout the paper. <\/p>\n
Grading Rubric: <\/p>\n
Unsatisfactory Fair Good Excellent<\/p>\n
Disorder and Diagnostic Criteria – Very few or no diagnostic criteria are identified.- The student does not display an understanding of the relationship between criteria and diagnoses. – Some criteria are included, with few examples.- Diagnostic ideas are present, but not well supported by symptoms or evidence. – The diagnostic criteria are given and supported with some examples. – The student displays a general understanding of how the disorder presents. – Diagnostic criteria are stated and clearly backed with ample examples.- Clear connection is made between specific criteria and overall presentation of individuals with the given disorder <\/p>\n
Prevalence & Chosen Population – Prevalence of the disorder in the general population is not identified<\/p>\n
– Population is discussed but no correlation is made between the disorder prevalence and the population chosen – Prevalence of the disorder in the general population is identified, but may not be supported by peer-reviewed sources<\/p>\n
– Basic description of population is given with some detail clarifying why population was chosen\/prevalence of the disorder among the population – Prevalence of the disorder in the general population is identified<\/p>\n
– Description of the chosen population and the prevalence of the disorder among that population is given, though no support is given by peer-reviewed sources. – Prevalence of the disorder in the general population is identified<\/p>\n
– Thorough description of the chosen population and the prevalence of the disorder among that population is given, with ample support by peer-reviewed sources. <\/p>\n
Treatment -Lacking in the description of treatment options and nuance of treatment within the population are discussed-Little to no support or supporting citations are not peer-reviewed.\u00a0<\/p>\n
-Basic description of treatment options are discussed-Information presented may not be supported by peer-reviewed research or fewer than 2 references.\u00a0<\/p>\n
-Adequate description treatment options and nuances of treatment population are discussed-Information presented is fully supported by at least 2 peer-reviewed references\u00a0<\/p>\n
-Complete description of treatment options and nuances of treatment population are discussed-Information presented is fully supported by at least 2 peer-reviewed references\u00a0<\/p>\n
Grammar, Spelling, & Punctuation – Paper contains numerous grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors.- Language uses jargon, slang or conversational tone.- Uses “I” or “me” throughout the paper.\u00a0 – There are some errors throughout the paper in punctuation, spelling, and\/or language.- Language is somewhat professional; some conversational tone or “I”\/”me” is occasionally used.\u00a0 – Rules of grammar, and punctuation are followed with minor errors. Spelling is correct.\u00a0– Language is mostly professional- Overall, the paper is comprehensive and easy to read.\u00a0 – Rules of grammar, usage, and punctuation are followed; spelling is correct.- Language is clear and precise; sentences display consistently strong, varied structure.- Professional language is used throughout the paper\u00a0<\/p>\n
Format – Paper lacks many elements of correct formatting.- Page requirement is inadequate or excessive- Paper is not in APA format.- Format and\/or flow make it difficult to follow the writing.\u00a0 – Paper is about 6-8 pages.- APA format has flaws, however, the general idea of how to format a paper in this structure comes across.- Format and flow neither add to nor subtract from the readability of the paper.\u00a0 – Paper follows designated guidelines.- Paper is 6-8 pages long.- APA format is good, with few errors.- Format and flow are good and deliberate.\u00a0 – Paper meets the 6-8 page requirement.- Paper is in APA format, following all guidelines for structure, format, font, margins, and spacing.-Format and flow between paragraphs enhances readability of paper.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
DSM Paper Guidelines and Rubric Students will write a 6-8 page research paper that will critically evaluate the treatment(s) available<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-49914","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry"],"yoast_head":"\n