CRiTICAL ANALYSIS OF LAST CALL: the Rise and Fall of Prohibition.<\/p>\n
A brilliant, authoritative and fascinating book about of America\u2019s 14 year period, from 1920-1933, when the U.S amendment of the constitution to prohibit one of the most favourite pastimes: drinking alcohol. The\u2019 last call\u2019 a book written by Daniel Okrent gives a definition of the rise and fall of the alcohol prohibition. The book contains the contains the effects of alcohol,both for having it and not having it, and the facts about it.Daniel Okrent was the first public editor of the New York times, he is a qualified writer since he has written four books in the past. The book gives the impact of the prohibition in the American life during that period.<\/p>\n
On January 16, 1920 the day before prohibition became the law of the land, the \u201cdry\u2019s\u201d were supremely optimistic about the coming days. From this time henceforth natives\u2019 bondage to alcohol was broken. “The reign of tears is over,” evangelist Billy Sunday told a revival meeting in Norfolk, Va. “Men will walk upright now, women will smile, and the children will laugh. Hell will be forever for rent.” <\/p>\n
The 18th amendment didn\u2019t so much as change the country\u2019s culture of drinking. The \u201cwets\u201d had their liquor and the \u201cdry\u2019s\u201d had their law. Prohibition attributed to Andrew J, Volsteadn who facilitated the 18th amendment of the constitution has most of the laws weaknesses and omissions attributed to him. Introduced in May 27, 1919 the bill was passed after a three month debate.\u201d No person shall manufacture, distribute, import, export alcohol\u201d the act replaced all dry legislative measures in force in the various states. The Volstead act though did prohibit the sale of various brands of alcohol, private possession of alcohol and consumption wasn\u2019t made illegal. It faced a lot of hostility from the most of Americans who argued despite the negative effects it was deemed as denying people their rights. Anti-prohibitionist criticized the ban of liquor as an intrusion of mainly rural Protestant ideals on a central aspect of immigrant, catholic everyday life. Lack of an agreement led to the growth of criminal organisations such as the American mafia and generated corruption within politicians in the police forces. The book shows how most of the great leaders were also dependent on alcohol. President Wilson, weakened by the losing fight to keep America within the league of Nations, backed and supported the amendment of the bill (Behr,1996).<\/p>\n
While the act was successful in reducing the amount of alcohol consumed it led to the widespread of underground criminal activities Many were astonished and disenchanted with the rise of spectacular gangland crimes (such as Chicago’s St.Valentines massacre), when prohibition was supposed to reduce crime. Prohibition lost its advocates one by one, while the wet opposition talked of personal liberty, new tax revenues from legal beer and liquor, and the scourge of organized crime. The prohibition became a great controversy since it was used by physicians for medication purposes<\/p>\n
The last call mainly shows or brings out on the politics of the prohibition. Even in the late 1918s most of the \u201cwets\u201d considered the law as a \u201cdead letter\u201d. Enforced temperance, after all, was a highly unpopular concept in many. <\/p>\n
quarters, particularly among city dwellers, immigrants, Catholics, Jews, blacks and an awful lot of native-born white Protestant males. Okrent shows how the dry forces — led by powerful interest groups like the Anti-Saloon League — overcame this stiff opposition, cobbling together an unlikely coalition of rural populists, urban progressives, women and nativists (even the KKK), all of whom had their own peculiar reasons for wanting to see the demise of legal alcohol. In the end, aided by a ratification process that gave disproportionate weight to voters in rural states, the \u201cdry\u2019s\u201d managed to push their amendment through — to the amazement of wets nationwide. The end of all this came when president Roosevelt redefine the law to by legalizing selling of liquor not more than 3.2% alcohol ( Towne , 1923).<\/p>\n
Through it all Americans went to greater lengths to smuggle, conceal, and to imbibe their favourite drink. Last call is peopled with vividly astonishing characters: Susan B. Anthony and Billy Sunday, William Jennings Bryan and bootlegger Sam Bronfman, Pierre S. du Pont and H. L. Mencken, Meyer Lansky and the incredible\u2014if long-forgotten\u2014federal official Mabel Walker Willebrandt, who throughout the twenties was the most powerful woman in the country. The book also includes Manhattan speakeasies, where relations between sexes were overturned forever. California vineyards producing \u201csacramental\u201d wine, New England fishing groups abandoned their fishing activities for more profitable rum- running business. In Washington , the congress itself, congressmen who had voted for prohibition drank openly.<\/p>\n
The author created much awareness on the effects of alcohol the people. The author uses ailments to emphasize on the negative side of alcohol ( Towne , 1923). Another lethal substance that was often substituted for alcohol was “canned heat\u201d. Forced through a handkerchief, it created a rough liquor substitute. However, the result was poisonous, though not often lethal. Many of those who were poisoned as a result united to sue the government for passing of the prohibition law. One of the foremost physicians Benjamin rush termed drunkenness as a disease both physically and psychologically and believed more in moderation than prohibition. Although it was highly controversial, Prohibition was widely supported by diverse groups. Progressives believed that it would improve society as generally did women, southerners, those living in rural areas and African-Americans. There were a few exceptions such as the Woman\u2019s Organization for Prohibition Reform who fought against it .During this period the government had a hard time keeping up with the rumrunners and bootleggers. In Boston crowd became furious and beat up a coast guard. In 1929 the U.S coast guard chased down an illegal rumrunner and when he refused to stop officers opened fire and killed him. Warning tremors of plummeting of the economy came in October 1929 when the price of wheat went down. Americans were plunged to a depression they had never known. Unemployment figures also started to raise in 1931 the level of the unemployed out of the total working population was 16 percent, following year it rose to 24 percent. Banks failures also scared the stable population hundreds of banks went down increasing the depression. Alcohol was still a major source of revenue for the government and its prohibition lead to the dwindling of the American economy. Americans looked up to president Hoover who kept normal routine hoping to build confidence in recovery.( Bennett, 2007). Ratification ended with the repealing of the eighteenth amendment by ratification of the twenty first amendment on December,5,1933. <\/p>\n
Daniel Okrent also tries to show why women were so against sale of alcohol. They complained most of their husbands behaviours lead to the breaking up of many families. They became irresponsible and ignored their responsibilities. Drunk driving lead to the death of many travellers, increased cost lead to bankruptcy, crime among other effects( Kobler, 1973)high level of immorality in the population increased due the drunkenness levels of rape cases increased most of the young men became unproductive on the other hand contrary to the lack of employment due to lack of jobs, in this case it reduced due to lack of responsible skilled manpower. As prohibition became more unpopular repeal became more anticipated economic emergency being the top most prioritized factor against the act. Poor enforcement of the law was also another factor that lead to the failure of the act. Additionally, enforcement of the 18th amendment lacked centralized authority and many attempts to impose prohibitionist laws were deterred due to the lack of transparency between federal and state authorities Despite the fall of The prohibit, a safer way of drinking, and maintenance of the economy balance was developed as shown in \u201clast call\u201d the economy so as its people grew stronger though they still didn\u2019t learn. After the amendment alcohol was sold but not in all countries. But still some states still continued embracing the prohibition law<\/p>\n
Cited from:<\/p>\n
Behr, E. (1996). Prohibition: thirteen years that changed America. New York: Arcade Pub.<\/p>\n
Bennett, W.(2007). America: The Last Best Hope, Volume 1.New York: Thomas Nelson Inc.<\/p>\n
Kobler, J.(1973).Ardent spirits: the rise and fall of prohibition. New York: G.P Putnam\u2019 sons.<\/p>\n
Towne ,C.H.(1923). The rise and fall of prohibition:The human side of the eighteenth amendment and the Volstead act have done to the United States. New York: Macmillan.co<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
CRiTICAL ANALYSIS OF LAST CALL: the Rise and Fall of Prohibition. A brilliant, authoritative and fascinating book about of America\u2019s<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-45774","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry"],"yoast_head":"\n