W3 Assignment<\/p>\n
W3 Assignment<\/p>\n
Criteria Ratings Pts<\/p>\n
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIntroductionIntroduction: Choose one recent (within 5 years) quantitative article related to any of the national practice problems.Requirements:a. Introduce selected practice problemb. Literature chosen is < 5 years oldc. Provides incidence and\/or prevalence of practice problem 10\u00a0pts<\/p>\n
Highest Level of Performance<\/p>\n
Includes all requirements and provides an excellent introduction. 9\u00a0pts<\/p>\n
Very Good or High Level of Performance<\/p>\n
Includes all requirements with a very good introduction. 8\u00a0pts<\/p>\n
Acceptable Level of Performance<\/p>\n
Includes 2 requirements with a basic introduction. 0\u00a0pts<\/p>\n
Failing Level of Performance<\/p>\n
Poor introduction and\/or includes 1 or fewer requirements.<\/p>\n
10\u00a0pts<\/p>\n
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLiterary Search Strategy<\/p>\n
Literary Search Strategy: Describe your library strategy for searching for the quantitative evidenceRequirements:Includes literature search strategy used:a. Identify databases searched to locate the recent quantitative literatureb. Include key words used in your searchc. Describe filters used 30\u00a0pts<\/p>\n
Highest Level of Performance<\/p>\n
Includes all requirements and provides an excellent appraisal of the quantitative article. 27\u00a0pts<\/p>\n
Very Good or High Level of Performance<\/p>\n
Includes all requirements and provides a very good description of the literature search. 24\u00a0pts<\/p>\n
Acceptable Level of Performance<\/p>\n
Includes 3 requirements and a basic description of the literature search. 0\u00a0pts<\/p>\n
Failing Level of Performance<\/p>\n
Includes 2 or fewer requirements and\/or provides a poor description of the literature search.<\/p>\n
30\u00a0pts<\/p>\n
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCritique of Article Using the John Hopkins Appraisal<\/p>\n
Tool: Use the Johns Hopkins Appraisal tool to conduct a critique of the quantitative article.Requirements:a. Present the aim of the studyb. Share research method and design usedc. Provide Sample size & description of sampled. Present an overview of the findings\/outcomese. Share strengths and limitations of the studye. Appraise the level and grade the quality of the study 30\u00a0pts<\/p>\n
Highest Level of Performance<\/p>\n
Includes all requirements and provides an excellent description of the literature search strategy. 27\u00a0pts<\/p>\n
Very Good or High Level of Performance<\/p>\n
Includes all requirements and provides a very good appraisal of the quantitative article. 24\u00a0pts<\/p>\n
Acceptable Level of Performance<\/p>\n
Includes no fewer than 4 requirements and provides a basic appraisal of the quantitative article. 0\u00a0pts<\/p>\n
Failing Level of Performance<\/p>\n
Includes 3 or fewer requirements and\/or provides a poor appraisal of the quantitative article.<\/p>\n
30\u00a0pts<\/p>\n
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSummarySummary: Summarize in your own words the article findingsRequirements:1. Provide a summary detailing the main points and overall findings2. Discuss if this is a solution that can contribute to the practice problem 40\u00a0pts<\/p>\n
Highest Level of Performance<\/p>\n
Includes all requirements and provides an excellent summary of the quantitative article. 36\u00a0pts<\/p>\n
Very Good or High Level of Performance<\/p>\n
Includes all requirements and provides a very good summary of the quantitative article. 32\u00a0pts<\/p>\n
Acceptable Level of Performance<\/p>\n
Includes no fewer than 3 of the requirements and provides a basic summary of the quantitative article. 0\u00a0pts<\/p>\n
Failing Level of Performance<\/p>\n
Includes 2 or fewer requirements and\/or provides a poor summary of the quantitative article.<\/p>\n
40\u00a0pts<\/p>\n
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeConclusionConclusion: Effectively summarize the content in the paperRequirements:a. Provides a clear and logical conclusion in no more than 1-2 concise paragraphsb. Highlight the summary of findingsc. Highlights overall quality (level and grade)d. Conclude the value of the study to practice problem 10\u00a0pts<\/p>\n
Highest Level of Performance<\/p>\n
Includes all the requirements and provides an excellent conclusion. 9\u00a0pts<\/p>\n
Very Good or High Level of Performance<\/p>\n
Includes all requirements and provides a very good conclusion. 8\u00a0pts<\/p>\n
Acceptable Level of Performance<\/p>\n
Includes no less than 2 requirements and provides a basic conclusion. 0\u00a0pts<\/p>\n
Failing Level of Performance<\/p>\n
Includes 1 or fewer requirements and\/or provides a poor conclusion.<\/p>\n
10\u00a0pts<\/p>\n
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA Style and organization for scholarly papers<\/p>\n
Requirements:a. Use level I headers for each sectionb. References and citations are in correct APA format per the current APA manualc. Length of APA formatted paper is 2-3 pages (excluding title page and references) 10\u00a0pts<\/p>\n
Highest Level of Performance<\/p>\n
Includes all requirements and presents excellent APA style and standards. 9\u00a0pts<\/p>\n
Very Good or High Level of Performance<\/p>\n
Includes 3 requirements and very good APA style and standards. 8\u00a0pts<\/p>\n
Acceptable Level of Performance<\/p>\n
Includes no fewer than 2 requirements of APA style and standards. 0\u00a0pts<\/p>\n
Failing Level of Performance<\/p>\n
Includes one or fewer requirements of APA style and standards.<\/p>\n
10\u00a0pts<\/p>\n
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeClarity of Writing<\/p>\n
Requirements:a. Use of standard English grammar and sentence structureb. No spelling errors or typographical errorsc. Organized around the required components using appropriate headers 10\u00a0pts<\/p>\n
Highest Level of Performance<\/p>\n
Includes all requirements and demonstrates excellent clarity of writing. 9\u00a0pts<\/p>\n
Very Good or High Level of Performance<\/p>\n
Includes all requirements and demonstrates very good clarity of writing. 8\u00a0pts<\/p>\n
Acceptable Level of Performance<\/p>\n
Includes no fewer than 2 requirements and basic clarity of writing 0\u00a0pts<\/p>\n
Failing Level of Performance<\/p>\n
Includes 1 or fewer requirements and\/or demonstrates poor clarity of writing.<\/p>\n
10\u00a0pts<\/p>\n
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAppendixAppendix: Evidence supportRequirements: Embed the completed Johns Hopkins Appraisal Tool as an appendix 10\u00a0pts<\/p>\n
Highest Level of Performance<\/p>\n
Includes the completed John Hopkins Appraisal tool as an appendix 0\u00a0pts<\/p>\n
Failing Level of Performance<\/p>\n
Does not include the John Hopkins Appraisal tool in the appendix or includes an incomplete Johns Hopkins tool in the appendix<\/p>\n
10\u00a0pts<\/p>\n
Total Points:\u00a0150<\/p>\n
PreviousNext<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
W3 Assignment W3 Assignment Criteria Ratings Pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIntroductionIntroduction: Choose one recent (within 5<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-42899","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry"],"yoast_head":"\n