University of Queensland Technovation Feasibility Report. The University of Queensland System Learning Technology Systems (UQ

University of Queensland Technovation Feasibility Report

Table of Contents

TOC o “1-3” h z u HYPERLINK l “_Toc397581317” Executive Summary PAGEREF _Toc397581317 h 1

HYPERLINK l “_Toc397581318” Introduction PAGEREF _Toc397581318 h 1

HYPERLINK l “_Toc397581319” Feasibility Report Methodology PAGEREF _Toc397581319 h 2

HYPERLINK l “_Toc397581320” Conditions and Limitations of the Report PAGEREF _Toc397581320 h 3

HYPERLINK l “_Toc397581321” Limitations of the feasibility report include PAGEREF _Toc397581321 h 3

HYPERLINK l “_Toc397581322” Background Information PAGEREF _Toc397581322 h 3

HYPERLINK l “_Toc397581323” Report Methodology PAGEREF _Toc397581323 h 4

HYPERLINK l “_Toc397581324” LEARNING MANAGEMENT SYSTEM Compatibility and Interoperability Survey Methodology PAGEREF _Toc397581324 h 5

HYPERLINK l “_Toc397581325” Interoperability and Flexibility Strategy PAGEREF _Toc397581325 h 5

HYPERLINK l “_Toc397581326” Overview of LEARNING MANAGEMENT SYSTEM Queensland Interoperability PAGEREF _Toc397581326 h 6

HYPERLINK l “_Toc397581327” Cost Effectiveness Strategy PAGEREF _Toc397581327 h 7

HYPERLINK l “_Toc397581328” Support and Training Strategy PAGEREF _Toc397581328 h 8

HYPERLINK l “_Toc397581329” Ease of Use Strategies PAGEREF _Toc397581329 h 8

HYPERLINK l “_Toc397581330” Sustainability PAGEREF _Toc397581330 h 10

HYPERLINK l “_Toc397581331” Present and Expected LEARNING MANAGEMENT SYSTEM Changes in the UQSLTS PAGEREF _Toc397581331 h 10

HYPERLINK l “_Toc397581332” Integration with Mobile Technology PAGEREF _Toc397581332 h 10

HYPERLINK l “_Toc397581333” Conclusions PAGEREF _Toc397581333 h 10

HYPERLINK l “_Toc397581334” Recommendations PAGEREF _Toc397581334 h 11

HYPERLINK l “_Toc397581335” References PAGEREF _Toc397581335 h 13

Executive SummaryThe University of Queensland System Learning Technology Systems (UQSLTS) Department distributed the Open Source Collaborative: Online Portal Study Evaluation Report (Randall, Sweetin and Steinbeiser) in August 2009. The Report inferred that Online Portal Study was a practical option to Study Platform in territories of usefulness, convenience, and aggregate expense of proprietorship. The Report likewise prescribed that a Learning Management System Feasibility Report be directed to answer the catch up exploration question, “What is the Finest Learning Management System answer for the QueensLand University System?” (Nsour et al., 2010). The feasibility study is considered as e-entrepreneurial technology project since it is not only profitable to the institution in monetary basis, but it also helps transform the lives of the users. Hence it is a viable technovation feasibility entrepreneurial study.

IntroductionThe UQSLTS Learning Technology Systems Department disseminated the OSC Online Portal Study Evaluation Report in August 2010. Is Online Portal Study a useful choice to Study Platform?” the project as found to be a practical alternative to Study Platform in scopes of convenience, usability, and total cost of ownership (Aravinthan, 2010). The Evaluation Team proposed that a Learning Management System Feasibility Report be regulated to answer the get up to speed examination question, “What is the Finest Learning Management System answer for the Queensland University System?” The Online Portal Study Evaluation Report inspected on the online course organization frameworks, Study Platform and Online Portal Study. This report, Learning Management System Feasibility Report: The second part of the Open Source Combined Online Portal Study Evaluation Report, considers the same programming claim for passing on virtual rule, yet has moved to the more recognized term, learning organization framework set up of the past, course organization framework (Hamilton et al., 2010).

Finest Learning Management System

The finest Learning Management System result is characterized in this report as one in which all learning management system parts are considered inside the aggregate learning systems of UQSLTS such that most extreme underreport achievement is guaranteed from both an institutional and System point of view. Parts of these segments inside the edge work of underreport achievement were evaluated by the accompanying traits: Tractability, Cost efficiency, and Sustenance and Exercise.

Feasibility Report Practice

The Evaluation Team made investigation instruments to address the particular and budgetary issues not had a tendency to in the OSC Online Portal Study Evaluation Report: Learning Management System Compatibility and Interoperability report, Upgrade/Migration Case Report outline, and (3) Total Seller Cost Examination. The inspiration driving the Compatibility and Interoperability report was to assemble benchmark actualities of Study Platform, Online Portal Study, and distinctive Learning Management Systems used all through the UQSLTS – most especially the amount of element courses and the amount of element understudies, despite evaluate of the modules that university use which are not bit of the Learning Management System’s inside thing. The Online Portal Study Migration and Study Platform Upgrade audits based upon the OSC Online Portal Study Evaluation Case Report revelations to uncover underlying examples and to center the costs joined with a LEARNING MANAGEMENT SYSTEM change – whether it be moving to Online Portal Study or climbing to structure 3.x of Study Platform. The Total Vendor Cost Analysis was an Evaluation of current Study Platform and Online Portal Study costs including predestined vender uses to the UQSLTS Organization and the discrete university.

Environments and Precincts of the ReportThe Feasibility Report is an exceptional assessment effort by employee’s portions of the UQSLTS Learning Technology Systems (LTS) Department. The Report simply expounds on Learning Management System establishment (present and future) inside the UQSLTS. All information accumulated by the Evaluation Team was assembled from studies controlled to partition learning, information advancement, and insightful heads at UQSLTS establishments; open reports, and dealer locales and creations.

The extent of the report was trying (Oliver, Whelan & Nash, 2008). Two diagram instruments were made, sent, and analyzed. Contracts attested by the State Board of Community University gave a critical piece of the total costs of ownership figures. Web possessions and vendor records were inspected. Much of this work happened at the end of spring semester 2010, when Queensland school employees and help employees were possessed with end-of-year commitments.

Limitations of the feasibility report includeCosts, employee’s time, and distinguishing proof of all assets connected with working a junior university Learning Management System demonstrated hard to report.

Learning Management System administration and organization includes a few zones of junior university operations including scholastic organization, separation learning, IT help, business office/acquisition, and underreport administrations. Responding to paramount inquiries did not generally reflect proper data from various territories as asked.

Background InformationUQSLTS detachment learning ventures have aggregately exceptional a “general public of joint exertion” in the process of late years. This happened due to phenomenal activity at both the System Office and key Queensland university beginning with made retreating from telecourses in the 1980s. Moreover, in the late 1980s the North Carolina General Assembly offered financing to satellite dishes and C/KU band beneficiaries for each one of the 68 UQSLTS organizations. This building gave downlinking limit of both business informational satellite undertakings and (2) ventures made by UQSLTS that misused encouraged TV creation including volunteer gatherings from Queensland university, expanded with master uplink organizations (Sharma, 2010). The stores from utilization of such volunteer gatherings engaged the UQSLTS to make many individuals more manifestations. Additionally, group parts got paramount imparted experience through relationship in these manifestations. Take off of the satellite frameworks, collaboration in satellite-cast era, and an undertaking with need to grant telecourse holdings and materials for underreport presentation and instructor get ready and help joined to further bond the general public of facilitated exertion which showed critical as web learning rose in the late 1990s.

Report MethodologyThe Feasibility Report focused on six sections that generally portray “What is the Finest Learning Management System answer for Queensland University’s? “The Evaluation Team imagined a three-area examination methodology to evaluate and survey these six sections in an effort to perceive the Finest Learning Management System answer for UQSLTS. The general course of occasions for instrument change and data aggregation was from January to February of 2012 with completion of data examination in August of 2012 (Steen, Wache & Wache, 2010). This philosophy supplements and develops the first Online Portal Study Evaluation Report of August 2009. The three-area methodology fuses:

learning Management System Compatibility and Interoperability Survey which gathered information about the general benchmarking truths of the Learning Management Systems in the frameworks, the comparability and interoperability of the Learning Management Systems with untouchable applications and organizations, and a short open-completed the process of Learning Management System needs evaluation.

Migration/Upgrade Case Report Survey to accumulate data concerning UQSLTS colleges’ development from Study Platform to Online Portal Study and overhaul by Study Platform clients to structure 7.x.

Total Learning Management System Seller Cost Analysis to review the total cost of Learning Management System proprietorship by the UQSLTS and the individual colleges as to dealer Learning Management System license costs, encouraging charges and an alternate additional

Learning Management System Compatibility and Interoperability Survey Methodology

The Evaluation Team created a review instrument that tended to the dominant part of things delineated in the Online Portal Study Evaluation Report suggestions. The primary necessity was to evaluate school responding in regards to similarity and interoperability of Learning Management System related applications, assets, and administrations. The Evaluation Team immediately acknowledged, be that as it may, that systems wide Learning Management System use was obscure. Prior to a Finest Learning Management System could be distinguished for the UQSLTS, current use required to be evaluated to conjecture future limit for adaptability and maintainability (Basnet, Brodie & Worden, 2010). Hence, the requirement for a benchmark segment of the review was obliged and the general overview structure was finished.

Flexibility and Interoperability StrategyFor the motives of this report, the Evaluation Team used the accompanying definitions:

Interoperability is the capability of the Learning Management System to incorporate with related fringe applications and administrations. Interoperability is a basic segment for arranging future learning engineering results.

Flexibility is the capability to effortlessly move learning substance done and finished with the Learning Management System and the capacity to squeeze applications to help the schools or the System. Adaptability is imperative in keeping with operation and business prerequisites in foresight of future redesigns and interoperability of related applications.

The Evaluation Team made the Compatibility and Interoperability Survey to collect benchmarking subtle element for both Study Platform and Online Portal Study, and to perceive and evaluate Learning Management System related value of the two frameworks.

Overview of Learning Management System Queensland InteroperabilityThe interoperability of UQSLTS colleges’ Learning Management Systems with Queensland Colleague, the System’s underreport information schema, is by far the most basic blend for Evaluation. The going with is an enhanced layout of the current Learning Management System blends with Queensland Colleague. For the reasons of this examination, consolidation is described as the passing of data beginning with one application then onto the following. The demise of data could be a confined system where one application simply creates data to an exchange application, or a two-way harmonized procedure where both applications stay in contact with each other. The technique of passing data may be proposed to be completely robotized with no human intercession, completely manual with no computerization, or a mixing of both. A third section or application could moreover be displayed as a temporary holding scope of data before being passed beginning with one application then onto the following.

Manual level document process – Learning Management Systems can incorporate with Queensland through a totally manual procedure of cluster transferring of level records with information sent out from Queensland. The methodology starts with the Queensland head designing scripts to fare the obliged information from the Queensland database to a level document. A level record is plain content which generally contains one record for every line:

A comma differentiated record form (CSV) is a sort of level document that could be utilized to move information from Queensland to the Learning Management System. The Learning Management System chairman takes the record and imports the CSV document into the Learning Management System where a grouping procedure utilizes the document to make the comparing course, client or part matching the record on the document. Most of the universities in the framework right now utilize this manual level document procedure of Queensland to Learning Management System incorporation.

Cost Effectiveness StrategyCost reasonability is the total estimation of quantifiable benefit of the Learning Management System to pass on focus handiness and usability with thought about the total budgetary inconvenience of Evaluation; acquisition; pilot testing; take off; representatives and workforce planning and sponsorship; and coordination of vital and helper learning advances that impact specific adjusting needs.

Assessing cost feasibility of the two Learning Management Systems was a segregating piece of the Feasibility Report. A three-pronged strategy was utilized to center the cost feasibility of each Learning Management System: Total cost of ownership by dealer (excepting empowering to oneself costs), study of Online Portal Study Evaluation Report examination try development costs, and total cost of migration/overhaul through the Feasibility Report Case Report survey.

Supreme Learning Management System Vendor Cost Analysis embodied approving charges, optional additional costs that schools decided to purchase, and merchant encouraging costs. This data was gotten clearly from the traders or from UQSLTS records. Total cost of movement/upgrade information was assembled through the Case Report range of the Feasibility report. The examination attempt request were drawn from the OSC Online Portal Study Evaluation Report Case Report questions which considered a more far reaching, longitudinal understanding of development costs. Disastrously, the Case Report information identifying with costs of development and update reported by the schools in the Feasibility Report wound up being clashing and volatile. Things being what they are, the Evaluation Team picked not to use that data, and utilized the data assembled within March 2009 from the Online Portal Study Evaluation Report Case Report portion.

Support and Training StrategyPlanning for workers joined with support and presentation for understudies were two of the most segregating execution segments recognized in the Online Portal Study Evaluation Report. To better get it the stream incorporated, the Evaluation Team assembled data from each of the 38 schools identifying with Learning Management System help and get ready got from shippers. For purposes of this report, the Evaluation Team portrayed help and get ready as the capacity of the Learning Management System to enable the colleges to execute Learning Management System-related learning advances, apply those advancements to learning and teaching, and totally utilize Learning Management System helpfulness.

The Evaluation Team made three request in the Compatibility and Interoperability Survey and one request in the Migration/Upgrade Case Report Survey identifying with Learning Management System Training and Support. The Evaluation Team similarly investigated the merchant related help and get ready stakes open to the UQSLTS schools.

Ease of Use Strategies

Learning Management System ease of use was sufficient had a tendency to in the convenience connection portion of the OSC Online Portal Study Evaluation Report. Understudies and staff much the same participated in evaluating convenience for both Online Portal Study and Study Platform, and thusly was not particularly secured in the Feasibility Report. The revelations are appropriate when considering “the Finest Learning Management System answer for UQSLTS,” and are discussed underneath.

The Student end-of-term review spoke to 32 various convenience enquiries and the Teacher end-of-term audit offered 10 unique accommodation questions. The results showed that Study Platform and Online Portal Study are not that unique concerning accommodation. The certified difference, regardless, was found in understudies’ perspective of their teachers’ comfort level with the application. There existed a significant correspondence between underreport rankings of both Study Platform and Online Portal Study with the evident comfort level of teachers when using either Learning Management System. Thusly, underreport perceptions were affected by educator experience, planning, and capabilities, paying minimal notice to Learning Management System.

Scalability

Flexibility is described as the limit of the Learning Management System to gainfully help both generous and little foundations with deft fittings/programming results at the macro and micro levels. Colleges were asked to react to four request identifying with flexibility in the Compatibility and Interoperability Survey. The Evaluation Team also examined shipper possessions as to versatility of the two Learning Management Systems.

Benchmarking thoughts were consolidated in the report to center the total degree of Learning Management System holdings used over the UQSLTS – making totals for all vital and assistant Learning Management Systems. Diagram request assessed the total number of element courses, total number of element customers, typical size of courses (in megabytes (MB)), and expected advancement of ordinary course size assessed. This data was accumulated in spring 2010 (Basnet, Brodie & Worden, 2010).

SustainabilityManageable quality is the last segment when asking, “What is the Finest Learning Management System answer for the UQSLTS?” For this report maintainability was characterized as the capacity to keep up a steady level of learning base and help needed to (1) meet the developing enlistment requests of understudies, (2) help, and (3) location impediments of financing, workforce needs, and help employees now and into what’s to come.

Present and Expected Learning Management System Changes in the UQSLTS

Four request regarding the current status of the Learning Management Systems and one as to expect changes in Learning Management Systems were fused in the Benchmarking Section of the Compatibility and Interoperability Survey. The essential request concerned current Learning Management System status at each school. “What is the fundamental Learning Management System your stronghold is at present using?” (Primary Learning Management System was described as passing on half or a more noteworthy measure of school courses). 46 schools utilization Study Platform as their vital Learning Management System

Integration with Mobile TechnologyThe system will be able to be used by students with android phone. The use of mobile application is of the e-entrepreneurial skills that the university is opting to use so that it could be able to absorb various users and to encourage the use of the Online Portal Study system.

ConclusionsThe Colleague-to-Learning Management System interoperability is the most indispensable compromise defying UQSLTS foundations. Manual level report process for data coordination is the most grasped technique. A standard Learning Management System data synthesis system is needed. The schools are using a far reaching mixture of pariah modules for both Learning Management Systems. Online Portal Study is a more versatile Learning Management System appearing to better support advancement of learning substance lock stock and done with the Learning Management System and is more customizable than Study Platform. On the other hand, Online Portal Study’s open source code gives the ability to Online Portal Study to be to a great degree specific. That specialization in like manner goes hand in hand with the threat of customization to the degree that fanning of Online Portal Study code happens and future Online Portal Study.org updates could be unreliable.

Online Portal Study is the financially savvy result if one considers approving, encouraging and cost for each right to gain entrance. There are costs joined with Learning Management System Movement, for instance, course change and customer get ready which were not evaluated in this report. Cost alone does not center the finest Learning Management System answer for the UQSLTS. Online Portal Study was more or less one third the cost of Study Platform in encouraging and has no allowing costs. The UQSLTS Study Platform contract considers empowering to oneself or encouraging with Study Platform ASP. The Online Portal Study colleges similarly have the decision of empowering to oneself, yet don’t have to use one particular ASP encouraging organization. This hinders the option of consolidated or regionalized Learning Management System encouraging, which could lower general costs, support standardization of learning designing for the entire System, and streamline coordination of all learning development applications.

RecommendationsIn case handiness, accommodation, and cost were the fundamental components to consider, Online Portal Study would be the finest general Learning Management System answer for Queensland University. Nevertheless, actualized development to Online Portal Study right now is not incited in light obviously movement costs, faculty planning essentials, and sufficient time and reason to move. Hence, a two-Learning Management System result is provoked for Queensland University until further report is done or sufficient sponsoring for development is gotten. The System Office is urged to offer sponsoring to support both Online Portal Study and Study Platform foundations, outfitting NC Community University with a sponsored Learning Management System choice. A work gathering made out of Queensland University System Office representatives and Office of State Budget and Management operators have already met and will continue gathering to discuss fitting two-Learning Management System money related help decisions. It is further recommended that two managing sheets of trustees of DL masters at lesser college, underpinned by SO representatives, be fabricated to help a Study Platform consortium and an Online Portal Study consortium to encourage and support each Learning Management System. These controlling bulletin gatherings would work in a near manner to the SIRSI/CCLINC consortium that regulates and arrangements with the joined library structure used by 16 of our organizations.

References

Alkhateeb, F., AlMaghayreh, E., Aljawarneh, S., Muhsin, Z., & Nsour, A. (2010). E-learning Tools and Technologies in Education: A Perspective. E-learning.

Aravinthan, V. (2010, October). Work in progress—Challenges in designing an Evaluation scheme for a diverse cohort of students. In Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), 2010 IEEE (pp. F4H-1). IEEE.

Basnet, B., Brodie, L., & Worden, J. (2010). Enhanced feedback-does peer Evaluation achieve this goal?. In Proceedings of the 21st Annual Conference for the Australasian Association for Engineering Education (p. 202). Engineers Australia.

Gray, K., Thompson, C., Sheard, J., Clerehan, R., & Hamilton, M. (2010). Students as Web 2.0 authors: Implications for Evaluation design and conduct. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 26(1), 105-122.

Oliver, B., Whelan, M. B., & Nash, R. (2008). Building course team capacity to enhance graduate employability.

Sharma, R. (2010). Impact of using Online Portal Study as an educational management tool to enhance learning for on campus and external mode electrical students at USQ. Eng. Educ.

Steen, T., Wache, M. D., & Wache, K. (2010). The evaluation of existing web-based marking tools that assess group work Project Report November 2010.