Rogerian Argument Essay

Rogerian Argument Essay

Student’s Name

Institutional Affiliation

Course Tittle

Professor’s Name

Date

Response to Essay Two

Why does the electrical college exist? To begin with, when well defined, The United States Electoral College signifies a group of presidential electors needed the Constitution to make each four years for the only aim of choosing the Head of State and vice president. In this system, every state acquires a particular quantity of electors depending on its overall number of congress representatives. According to this system’s history, it began in 1804 when the 12th Amendment of the constitution made sure that voters elect their ballots for vice president and president. Electoral colleges exist to call for the generation, every four years of a provisional collection of electors the same to the total number of Senate representatives (Heing, 2019). Every elector puts one electoral secret ballot ensuring the general election. Commonly, it is these electors who vote for the Head of State and not the American Individuals. In recent elections, the leading contender for attaining 270 of the 538 total electoral votes succeeds the White House. Some individuals assert the founding fathers considered the Electoral College over the direct election for the reason to balance the welfares of low-population and high-population states. However, the USA’s largest political parties have constantly run not among small and big states but amongst the coasts and the interior and the south and the north.

It has happened that many citizens of America want to eliminate the Electoral College as one of the means of electing the Head of State of the United States. More than a few developments have resulted in this institution’s perception: geographic disparities, income inequality, how discrepancies between Electoral College and the popular vote are possible to turn out to be more ordinary given geographic and economic inequities (McKinney, 2020). The Electoral College suffers from a difficulty called “faithless elector.” The problem whereby that body’s electors put their votes in opposition to the dictates of their nation’s common vote. A number of American individuals state that the Constitution ought to be amended, so the presidential contender who gets the highest votes countrywide wins. Campaigns for changing the Constitution have augmented to some extent since the time instantly after the 2016 election. The supporters’ attitudes on this concern have fully-fledged more apart since the 2016 voting, with Democrats turning out to be more supportive of the existing system. Among the criticisms on why the Electoral College should be eliminated includes: It is undemocratic, it practically eliminates third parties, tie, it allows the voting of an aspirant who does not win the most votes, and it distorts regular governance (Young, 2020). Besides, within each state, the electoral college betrays its supposed minority-rule values. Most individuals in the USA advocate for the Electoral College removed, and they request to choose the Head of State according to who attains the highest votes all over the country.

According to the opposing side, it is essential to abolish the Electoral College. The vice president and The Head of State are indirectly elected by the citizens and directly voted on by the electors. Even though this scheme is the main segment of America’s antiquity, numerous people have grown hatred. I think it is time for a change in the United States election process (McKinney, 2020). The first reason so as to why I advocate for this change is the reality that this structure provides more weight to votes cast in small states. Congress delegates two electors to every state; thus, there is no necessity to safeguard the small states additionally. The administration thinks that if the smaller regions were not offered additional electors at that point, the aspirants would center all their time on the big states. The régime needs contenders to petition entirely fifty states; therefore, this issue should not be a problem. Given that each state was offered an equal number of electors, then every state would get a similar appeal. I think that this system is generating a problem that it was supposed to aid fix. The contenders center their attention on those states with the largest quantity of electors, which is not different from focusing on the most populous states.

Every feature of the Electoral College favors particular groups of individuals and demonstrates biases. Other times, the results of the voting process do not reflect the vote of the vast majority of the individuals in the nation. As an alternative, the nation decides who to vote merely since the majority of the Electoral College is only one of the parties that govern that nation and not the other (Heing, 2019). This system should be abolished because it promotes political inequality. One more reason to eliminate the out-of-date Electoral College is that its complete design gives third parties very little and supports the two-party system if there is no opportunity to have a contender nominated.

However, there are worries that direct election might promote third parties or regionalism at the excesses of discourse. The Amendment of the constitution that will result in eliminating the Electoral College would rightly trigger debates over ranked-choice or voting to make sure the majority rule. This system makes the United States voting process less contentious by giving a clear ending (Neu, 2018). There lacks a need for a national recount when the electoral college exists. It also makes it easy for candidates to campaign in a way that they don’t have to spend a lot of money or time persuading voters. In addition, it keeps the two-party system strong and provides a clean, widely accepted ending to the election most of the time.

Five times in history, the president who got chosen lost the popular vote but won more electoral votes. The Electoral College is not as better as it appears. It happens to exclude individuals. In addition, it also gives electors a lot of power. Advocates of political voting transformation commonly support replacing it with direct popular elections, completely eliminating the electoral college system, or fixing perceived flaws in the current system. The direct selection alternate would substitute the existing system with a solitary, national count of popular votes. The electoral college has its benefits so that there is no possibility of a protracted national recount or a run-off election.

Reference

Heing, B. (Ed.). (2019). Critical Perspectives on the Electoral College. Enslow Publishing, LLC.

McKinney, M. (2020). Electoral College Reform: Past, Present, and Future Implications of the United States Electoral College System.

Neu, D. (2018). Proportional Representation Electoral Systems and Minority Representation in the American Legislature: A Comparative Analysis of Potential Reforms.

Rathbone, M. (2018). Reform of the Electoral College. Political Insight, 9(4), 16-19.

Young, C. (2020). The Electoral College and the Winner Takes All System.