Uncategorized

Model, hypothesis, and Criteria for causality

Model, hypothesis, and Criteria for causality

Student’s name

Instructor

Department of affiliation

Course

Date

C; Model and hypothesis

In the schematic diagram, it is clear that the debate about the presence of mental health issues experienced later in life might be a close relationship to a person’s past. This was especially their childhood experiences, trauma, and issues when they were children and were not pleasant (Nemeroff, 2004). It is therefore upon this that we can develop the various hypotheses; some of the hypotheses for this paper include;

Post-traumatic stress disorder is a sign that a person did not heal completely from the traumatic disorder which they experienced before

Childhood trauma experience has a very close and straightforward relation to a person’s mental issues, which they face once they are grown up.

Schizophrenia is a sign of the different ways the pain and the emotional torture a child experiences when they are young is expressed through their behavior.

Bipolar disorder is very clearly related to the childhood of a person.

This means that if a person gets good treatment when they are young and provided with the necessary love and support they majorly need at this point, they are unable to develop bipolar issues since they can only display what a person lacked.

The first hypothesis talks of how post-traumatic disorder indicates a need for continued care and love, which has to be given to those suffering from this kind of issue. Once there is enough love, then most of the time, the feeling of being un-important fades away. The feeling of having lost everything is worked in so that it does not affect a person’s entire life and the generalizations they make about their lives and generally life. Childhood trauma is stated to be a clear and direct factor towards the quality of a person’s mental health issues, the intensity, and their ability to control what happens to them. Another way childhood trauma expresses itself clearly from the time a person reaches the adolescent years is through schizophrenia. This makes a person restless and unable to sleep, and this is a problem that needs to be looked into urgently once the hypothesis is confirmed as true or not true and what remedies to be availed to make sure that schizophrenia does not adversely affect a person (Lubin, et, al., 2003).

Therefore the assertion that a childhood’s early years can affect how the child, when grown up, indicates through social life that they had at some point a disturbing experience. The group question, which states that a person’s later life is mainly based on how the child’s upbringing takes a central place in the work, especially in the worlds and the lives of the child’s parents, is confirmed never leaves a family. Therefore, most of the time, the parents never wish to hurt their children, but rather through disciplining, it later becomes a psychological issue and torture. Therefore basically, the research question is justifiable through the discussion of the major tenets which affect them.

How this portion of the research is understood is a critical and important aspect of the whole general way of understanding and building upon the issue. That is mental health and what it means for a person to be mentally unwell and sometimes unaware but still express themselves through behaviors and how they deal with issues. According to Freud (Barnes, 1952), the stages in which a child develops from the time they are born and if they receive what their bodies need both physically and emotionally determines the different ways in which to heal and deal with what happened to the person in question.

D. Criteria for causality

Even though it is true that a person needs to have emotional balance, this does not always happen and for every person. Therefore, when this does not happen, different people have different ways of dealing with their trauma in their lives at different stages. How the variables and the tenets of this paper are related is a very good one as it creates trust, love, peace, and harmony. For example, if a person did not get emotional stability when they were young, however with growing up they come to live with a very good family which provides emotional support, then it becomes very easy to blend. However, this does not always happen automatically and, therefore, the need to take care of one another.

The correlation between emotional stability and family is a good example. Most of the families do not experience harmony and total peace. However, a person has to be able to move on and live a good life. The desires for these wishes and needs at that particular time, even though great and important, might not always be possible. However, if possible, and I create time with the person, there will be ease. This leads to understanding how the different aspects of society view and manage their lives and how they can manage to fulfill the innate desires of their bodies of being loved and accepted. When a person gets these experiences and visible to the outside world, the time is taken between when a person gets these experiences is also of great significance. This is because what a person experiences can show up so much later in life or show very early in their lives when they are kids. Therefore, when a person experiences the effects of their childhood, they are important and trust the other party. Therefore, proper guidance, love, and compassion for their lives become important instruments (El‐Sheikh, 2007).

The intensity of trauma when a person is a child may be taken as the independent variables. Therefore, the other variables are also of great importance, like the time taken to show up, the ability for a person to trust, among other factors that are of great significance to the individual’s life. The relationship between these variables leads us to the conclusions and discussion. If the intensity of trauma a child experienced is increased, then it means that the child will experience more trauma later in life. However, if the intensity of trauma is low, it means that a person’s experiences later in life are not very complex, like having had a lot of trauma when the child was young.

ReferencesBarnes, C. A. (1952). A statistical study of the Freudian theory of levels of psychosexual development. Genetic Psychology Monographs.

Cherry, Kendra. “Freud’s Psychosexual Stages of Development.” Verywell Mind, Verywellmind, 12 Jan. 2006, www.verywellmind.com/freuds-stages-of-psychosexual-development-2795962.

El‐Sheikh, M., Buckhalt, J. A., Mark Cummings, E., & Keller, P. (2007). Sleep disruptions and emotional insecurity are pathways of risk for children. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 48(1), 88-96.

Lubit, R., Rovine, D., Defrancisci, L., & Eth, S. (2003). Impact of trauma on children. Journal of Psychiatric Practice®, 9(2), 128-138.

Nemeroff, C. B. (2004). Neurobiological consequences of childhood trauma. The Journal of clinical psychiatry.