How does the political environment influence the aligned initiative for environmental issues in relation to urban populations

How does the political environment influence the aligned initiative for environmental issues in relation to urban populations?

It should come as no surprise that the political atmosphere may have a significant impact not just on individual enterprises but also on the community as a whole. Governments play an important role in achieving development goals and targets by, among other things, establishing and enforcing quality regulatory frameworks and standards; controlling pollutant discharge into the environment; managing, recycling, and reusing wastewater; and controlling pollutant release into the atmosphere (Signal et al., 2013). These issues, which are under the mandate of local and federal institutions, in turn determine how well environmental issues are tackled at both the national and local setting.

There is a link between a country’s political atmosphere and its economic situation. The efficiency of actions taken to ameliorate environmental concerns caused by urban pollution is influenced by the status of the economy. For example, Anderson and Mossialos (2019) found that depending on who controls the government of a country, the policies of that country may alter somewhat from one administration to the next. As a result, issues such as taxes and the amount of money spent by the government have an impact on the economy. There is a chance that a rise in overall government spending may enhance the economy, in addition to providing more funds for environmental initiatives. In this case, the political environment influences the extent to which policies can successfully serve the people who are supposed to benefit from them.

It is likely that the present administration’s policies and actions will have an impact on the political environment at any level of government, from the national to the local. Another way that the political climate affects attempts to address environmental problems such as pollution is the technique by which governments update their laws and regulations in reaction to changes in the political climate. This, in turn, may influence how other governments or non-governmental organizations frame their policy objectives. It is probable that changes to the legislation governing the disposal of plastics and other garbage will have an impact on how pollution issues are addressed across the nation, not only in cities.

Another aspect that influences the political climate’s impact on the condition of health and environmental challenges in cities is the degree of political stability. A country’s economy suffers when its government is unable to carry out its responsibilities properly (Saunders et al., 2020). Policy disagreements are typical experienced in New Zealand whenever there is a change pr a transition period in administration. This time frame may have an impact on the level of success attained in implementing environmental programs.

In summary, the role of governments in passing legislation opens the door to alternative avenues through which the political climate might impact attempts to address environmental challenges, such as pollution. Governments pass legislation, which has an influence on how health and environmental organizations engage with the general public. Laws, in addition to changing people’s perceptions of ecological consciousness in general and the environment in particular, impose their will on the social and cultural surroundings in which they function. For example, if New Zealand prohibited the use of plastic packaging, more individuals would get active in environmental concerns, making it much simpler to put legislation in place.

References

Anderson, M., & Mossialos, E. (2019). Beyond gross domestic product for New Zealand’s wellbeing budget. The Lancet Public Health, 4(7), e320-e321.

Saunders, W. S., Kelly, S., Paisley, S., & Clarke, L. B. (2020). Progress toward implementing the Sendai framework, the Paris agreement, and the sustainable development goals: Policy from Aotearoa New Zealand. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 11(2), 190-205.

Signal, L. N., Walton, M. D., Ni Mhurchu, C., Maddison, R., Bowers, S. G., Carter, K. N., … & Pearce, J. (2013). Tackling ‘wicked’health promotion problems: a New Zealand case study. Health promotion international, 28(1), 84-94.