Differences between waterfall and agile project management

ENTERPRISE PROJECT MANAGEMENT

Differences between waterfall and agile project management:

Methodologies

Waterfall project management is distinguished by its sequential manner of operation. There are a number of phases that need to be followed before the success of the project is realized. One of the major drawbacks with this approach is that enough attention must be paid before moving to the next phase since there is no room for the revisit of the prior stage. This means that any identified change cannot be fixed and thus the program tends to be inefficient and unreliable.

Unlike waterfall project, agile project management is well known for its efficiency in operation. It creates emphasis on interactive principles in achieving it values and thus it tends to be more on principles than on the processes followed. Alterations on the development of the project are normally carried and this goes beyond making continuous evaluation on the project.

Applications

Waterfall programs are mostly utilized in manufacturing and construction fields. They are known for their vital contribution in these areas since the values of the products are known upon finalizing on it.

Agile projects have a wide utilization in the software fields and in websites development. This is the reason why for any development of software to be put in place, adaptive and innovation room is provided so as to check on the quality and any emerging alterations.

Operation

Plan and managerial aspects plays a major role in the success of a waterfall project. It is noticed that referencing is common and thus any change has to be made after the initial stage.

However, agile project ensures the value of the final quality

is of high standard and thus efficient and highly reliable approach.

Adaptations that a project manager should make in managing agile projects compared to the traditional waterfall projects:

Exploring

A good leader should embrace exploration so as to create room for feasible and achievable goals. To instill motivation in the workforce, an inspirational and creative leader is most appropriate since he makes it possible to set practicable goals. Recent research indicates that the agile leaders form the pillar for organization through encouraging the junior staffs in coping with the changing environment in their place of work.

Reflective

Agile leaders should possess imaginary mindset and adoptive practices to achieve the set goals. There are varying innovative ideas that the workforce bears and not unless they are included in the decision making forums, they end und up been unutilized and as well as creating the spirit of detest. Seriousness and implementation of inclusiveness in the managerial processes should be adhered to.

Adaptations that the PMO should make when handling agile projects/programs in contrast to handling traditional waterfall projects/programs

Transparency

There you be the openness in delivering information to the rest of the team. This helps in knowing areas to be improved as well as heightening level of honesty to the customers. Retrospective steps should be included though holding recurring discussions.

Delivery strategy: The undisputable means of winning the clients is through displaying achievement I running any project. This means that team work and seriousness will tend to make the processes efficient and thus will shift customers to opt for the job since it tends to be cheaper in long ru as compared to the traditional waterfall projects.